Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The phrase " I know it when I see it " is a colloquial expression by which a speaker attempts to categorize an observable fact or event, although the category is subjective or lacks clearly defined parameters. It has been a common expression since at least the 19th century. A similar phrase appears in Arthur Conan Doyle 's The Hound of the ...
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court clarifying the legal definition of obscenity as material that lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value". [1]
Miller test. The Miller test, also called the three-prong obscenity test, is the United States Supreme Court 's test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and can be prohibited. [1][2]
Dominick Fernow. Ian Dominick Fernow[1] is an American experimental musician, poet and multimedia artist. He is best known for extreme music released under the stage name Prurient, as well as numerous other aliases including Vatican Shadow, Rainforest Spiritual Enslavement and Christian Cosmos. [2]
Apart from prurient interest, why should any of us really care? Read more:Abcarian: School kids, get off your damn phones! Trust me, you will thank us later ... In 1992, a few years before Bill ...
Under the Miller test, speech is unprotected if "the average person, applying contemporary community standards, [54] would find that the [subject or work in question], taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest", "the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by ...
The U.S. Supreme Court has held content appealing to prurient interest is “material having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts,” and defined it as “a shameful or morbid interest in nudity ...
The basic guidelines for the trier of fact must be: (a) whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, (b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and ...